Wouaw Motherboard parle de mon petit IMSI-Catcher :-p
https://github.com/Oros42/IMSI-catcher/
Ça a font petit effet sur les stats :
https://ecirtam.net/links/myimg/IMSI-catcher_effet_Motherboard.png

via https://twitter.com/josephfcox/status/1063450887966941184
via https://shaarli.igox.org/?m7zfmQ
— Permalink

Cool :-p
Es’hail 2
https://www.n2yo.com/satellites/?c=18
— Permalink

— Permalink

+1 ^_^
— Permalink

Et non, Spectre et Meltdown , c'est pas fini !
— Permalink

— Permalink

— Permalink

— Permalink

— Permalink

https://github.com/FluxionNetwork/fluxion
— Permalink

— Permalink

— Permalink

via https://dukeart.netlib.re/shaarli/?RE0Rrw
— Permalink

https://www.tensorflow.org/guide/eager
— Permalink

Pour tester la neutralité du réseau.
https://github.com/FangfanLi/wehe_desktop
— Permalink

https://github.com/abperiasamy/rtl8812AU_8821AU_linux
https://github.com/aircrack-ng/rtl8812au
— Permalink

https://www.niehs.nih.gov/news/newsroom/releases/2018/november1/index.cfm
https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/results/areas/cellphones/
https://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/materials/cell_phone_radiofrequency_radiation_studies_508.pdf

-> https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/research/areas/cellphone/slides_bioem_wyde.pdf

Notes :
Étude faite par le National Toxicology Program (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Toxicology_Program)
Exposition à des fréquences de 900Mhz à 1900Mhz (CDMA et GSM (2G et 4G))
1,5 à 6 watts/kg pour les rats
2,5 à 10 watts/kg pour les souris

«
NTP studies found that exposure to high levels of RFR, like that used in 2G and 3G cell phones, was associated with:
- Clear evidence of tumors in the hearts of male rats.
- Some evidence of tumors in the brains of male rats.
- Some evidence of tumors in the adrenal glands of male rats.
»
«NTP found longer lifespans among the exposed male rats. This may be explained by an observed decrease in chronic kidney problems that are often the cause of death in older rats.»
— Permalink

via https://bookmarks.xavierbarbot.com/?f8biuQ
— Permalink

— Permalink

Pas nouveau.
Bon le titre est assez trompeur avec le verbe «voir». C'est plus une détection de changement des ondes qu'une vision.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.10109
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.10109.pdf
— Permalink